Skip to main content
Search for articles, authors, keywords
Abstract:

The article analyzes the 2019 case "Polyakh and Others v. Ukraine" and the European Court of Human Rights' latest standards regarding the applicability of Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 in lustration cases. In its judgment on the Polyakh case, the Court found a violation of all applicants' right to respect for private life due to the application of lustration measures by Ukraine. Based on the Court's previous practice regarding lustration in Central and Eastern European states and the Council of Europe's practice, it was concluded that the application of lustration measures, such as dismissal coupled with a ban on holding public office for ten years, along with the premature inclusion of the lustrated person's name into a publicly available lustration list, significantly impacts the person's private life. Consequently, Article 8 of the Convention is deemed applicable. If, instead of dismissal, the applicants had been offered a transfer to other less responsible positions or afforded the possibility of employment in the civil service, the Court, due to the reduced impact of the applied lustration measures on the applicants' privacy, would not have invoked Article 8 of the Convention.

Creative Commons BY-SA

Article statistics

Polivanova, Olena, Kateryna Nykolyna, Kyrylo Stepanenko, Serhii Myroslavskyi, and Alla Puktetska. (2022) 2022. “Polyakh and Others V. Ukraine: The Latest Standards of Applicability of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights in Lustration Cases”. Connections: The Quarterly Journal 21 (4): 11-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.21.4.03.
1958 Views
664 Downloads

Bibliography

O.V. Stogova, “Lustration as the Precondition of Effective Fight against Corruption,” Modern Society 1, no. 11 (2016): 167-177, 170, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.51248

Larysa Denisenko, “Lustration Should Not Turn into Political Revenge,” Deutsche Welle, October 18, 2019, https://www.dw.com/uk/коментар-люстрація-не-має-перетворюватися-на-політичну-помсту/a-50891070

“Grand Chamber Panel’s Decisions” (European Court of Human Rights, September 9, 2019), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=003-6499586-8573502

“European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,” as amended by Protocols nos. 11 and 14, ETS 5 (European Court of Human Rights, 1950), https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c

“Case of Polyakh and Others v. Ukraine” (Strasbourg: Europen Court of Human Rights, October 17, 2019), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-196607

Oleksandr Radchuk, “Instead of Lustration: Is There an Alternative to the Law on the Cleansing of Power,” Slovo I Dilo, October 22, 2019, https://www.slovoidilo.ua/2019/10/22/kolonka/aleksandr-radchuk/polityka/lyustracziyi-chy-isnuye-alternatyva-zakonu-pro-ochyshhennya-vlady

Yutaka Arai-Takahashi, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002), 320 p.

Iain Cameron, An Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights (Uppsala: Iustus Förlag, 2002), 200 p.

H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui, “Defining Private Life Under the European Convention on Human Rights by Referring to Reasonable Expectations,” California Western International Law Journal 35, no. 2 (2005): 153-202, https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwilj/vol35/iss2/2/

David Feldman, “The Developing Scope of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights,” European Human Rights Law Review 3 (June 1997): 265-274.

Ursula Kilkelly, “The Right to Respect for Private and Family Life. A Guide to the Implementation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights,” Human Rights Handbooks, No. 1 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, August 2003), https://rm.coe.int/168007ff47

Loukis G. Loucaides, Essays on the Developing Law of Human Rights (International Studies in Human Rights) (Brill-Nijhoff, 1995), 240 p.

John G. Merrills, The Development of International Law by the European Court of Human Rights (New York, NY: Manchester University Press, 1993), 265 p.

F. Ost, “The Original Canons of Interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights,” in The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights: International Protection Versus National Restrictions, ed. Mireille Delmas-Marty and Christine Chodkiewicz (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992), 238-318.

Ivana Roagna, Protecting the Right to Respect for Private and Family Life under the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe Human Rights Handbooks (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2012), 1-96, https://rm.coe.int/16806f1554.

Pieter van Dijk and G.J.H. van Hoof, Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998).

Katy Crossley-Frolick, “Sifting through the Past: Lustration in Reunified Germany,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. Vladimira Dvořáková and Anđelko Milardović (Zagreb: Political Science Research Centre, 2007), 197-213.

Roman David, Lustration and Transitional Justice: Personnel Systems in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).

Neviana Dosti, “Dealing with the Past: The Limited Opening of the Files in Albania,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 223-224.

Jakob Finci, “Lustration and Vetting Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 217-221.

Raluca Grosescu, “The Role of Civil Society in the Romanian Transitional Justice Failure,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 183-195.

Gábor Halmai, “Lustration and Access to the Files of the Secret Police in Central Europe,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 19-46.

Cynthia M. Horne, “International Legal Rulings on Lustration Policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Rule of Law in Historical Context,” Law & Social Inquiry 34, no. 3 (Summer 2009): 713-744, https://cynthiamhorne.weebly.com/uploads/8/9/9/8/8998042/lsi-horne_legal_rulings.pdf

Matt Killingsworth, “Lustration after Totalitarianism: Poland’s Attempt to Reconcile with Its Communist Past, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43, no. 3 (September 2010): 275-284, https://www.jstor.org/stable/48609722

Natalia Letki, “Lustration and Democratisation in East-Central Europe,“ Europe-Asia Studies 54, no. 4 (2002): 529-552, https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130220139154

Ivan Markešić, “The Catholic Church in Croatia: From Tending to Lustration to Lustration Crisis,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 111-126.

Anđelko Milardović, “Elite Groups in the Waves of Democratization and Lustrations,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 85-110.

Barbara A. Misztal, “How Not to Deal with the Past: Lustration in Poland,” European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 40, no. 1 (1999): 31-55, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600007268

Dragoş Petrescu, “Dilemmas of Transitional Justice in Post-1989 Romania,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 127-151.

Vesna Rakić-Vodinelić, “An Unsuccessful Attempt of Lustration in Serbia,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 169-182.

Julija Ravaitytė, “Evaluation of the Lustration Policy in Lithuania,” Politologija 77, no. 1 (2015): 49-100, https://doi.org/10.15388/Polit.2015.77.7374

Larry Ray, “At the End of the Post-Communist Transformation? Normalization or Imagining Utopia?” European Journal of Social Theory 12, no. 3 (2009): 321-336, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009337

Raluca Ursachi, “In Search of a Theoretical Framework of Transitional Justice Toward a Dynamic Model,” in Lustration and Consolidation of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe, 65-83.

Ya.V. Vuks, “Lustration Legislation in Eastern Europe and Its Meaning for the Western World,” Master’s Thesis (Texas: The University of Texas at Arlington, 2014).

Kieran Williams, Brigid Fowler, and Aleks Szczerbiak, “Explaining Lustration in Central Europe: A ‘Post-communist Politics’ Approach,” Democratization 12, no. 1 (2005): 22-43, https://doi.org/10.1080/1351034042000317943

Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to Respect for Private and Family Life, Home and Correspondence (Council of Europe/Europen Court of Human Rights, 2022), www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_8_ENG.pdf

“Case of Turek v. Slovakia,” Case No. 57986/00 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 2006), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-72354, https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/turek-v-slovakia/

“Sõro v. Estonia,” Case No. 22588/08 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), 2015), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-10689, http://melaproject.org/node/526

“Case of Karajanov v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,” No. 2229/15 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2017), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186294, http://biroescp.gov.mk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CASE-OF-KARAJANOV-v.-THE-FORMER-YUGOSLAV-REPUBLIC-OF-MACEDONIA-.pdf

“Naidin v. Romania,” Case No. 38162/07 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2014), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-4910840-007274&filename=003-4910840-6007274.pdf

“Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania,” Cases No. 55480/00 and 59330/00 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2004), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-173086

“Case of Ždanoka v. Latvia,” Case No. 58278/00 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2006), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61827

“Case of Matyjek v. Poland,” Case No. 38184/03 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2007), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-80219

“Case of Rotaru v. Romania,” Case No. 28341/95 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2000), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58586

Mark S. Ellis, “Purging the Past: The Current State of Lustration Laws in the Former Communist Bloc,” Law and Contemporary Problems 59, no. 4 (Fall 1996): 181-196, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol59/iss4/14

Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), 3-6.

PACE Resolution 1096 “Measures to Dismantle the Heritage of Former Communist Totalitarian Systems” (Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, June 27, 1996), https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/xref/x2h-xref-viewhtml.asp?fileid=7506&lang=en

PACE Resolution 1096 “Measures to Dismantle the Heritage of Former Communist Totalitarian Systems.”

“Guidelines to Ensure that Lustration Laws and Similar Administrative Measures Comply with the Requirements of a State Based on the Rule of Law” (Council of Europe, 1996), http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/xref/x2h-xref-viewhtml.asp?fileid=7506&lang=en

Veronika Bílková, “Lustration: The Experience of Czechoslovakia/ the Czech Republic,” report presented at the Conference on “Past and Present-day Lustration: Similarities, Differences, Applicable Standards” (Strasbourg: European Commission for Democracy through Law, 2015), https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-PI(2015)028-e

Momchil Metodiev, “Bulgaria,” in Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: Reckoning with the Communist Past, ed. Lavinia Stan (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009), 166.

Luc Huyse, “Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past,” Law & Social Inquiry 20, no. 1 (1995): 51-78, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1995.tb00682.x

“Bruggemann and Scheuten v. Federal Republic of Germany,” Case No. 6959/75, Report of the Commission (European Commission of Human Rights, Council of Europe, July 12, 1977), https://www.globalhealthrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Bruggemann-v.-Germany.pdf

“Case of Niemietz v. Germany,” Case No. 13710/88 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 1992), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-57887

“Case of Denisov v. Ukraine,” Case No. 76639/11 (Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2018), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186216, https://laweuro.com/?p=5288

“Interim Opinion on the Law on Government Cleansing (Lustration Law) of Ukraine Adopted by the Venice Commission at Its 101st Plenary Session” (Venice, 12-13 December 2014), https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2014)044-e

“Law of Ukraine on Government Cleansing,” No. 1682-VII (2014), https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/1682-18

“Access to and Disclosure of Documents and Exposure of the Affiliation of Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian People’s Army Act,” https://lex.bg/bg/laws/ldoc/2135540283

Denis Malyuska, “Decision of the ECtHR on Lustration,” https://www.facebook.com/people/Denis-Malyuska/100011121947008/

Themes