Defense institutions
From Civil-Military Relations to Resilience: The Fifth Wave of Strengthening Democracy through Research and Education

Twenty-Five Years of Excellence in Collaborative Research and Education

Quality Assurance in Military Higher Education Institutions: Worldwide Patterns and Trends

Reforming Serbia's Normative Framework and Suppression of Organized Crime as a Major Security Threat - A Never-ending Story

The Balkans at a Crossroads: Security, Integration, and the Future of Europe

Ukraine's Existential War: Dimensions of a Global Conflict

Optimization of the Chief Information Officer Function in Large Organizations

Defense Education Enhancement Program in Ukraine: The Limits of NATO’s Education Program
Introduction
The so-called “Revolution of Dignity,” that took place between November 2013 and March 2014 in Ukraine, gave Russia a pretext to seize the Crimea and engage proxy forces in the Donbas to rebel against the new Ukrainian administration. Seen from the point of view of NATO, this is an unprovoked action that threatens the status quo in Europe. It seems therefore normal that thus challenged, prudence would counsel the strongest possible support to Ukraine, to demonstrate resolve and reassure the Alliance’s Eastern flank.

Defence Institution Building in Ukraine at Peace and at War
Introduction
In 1991, independent Ukraine inherited from the Soviet Union sizeable conventional military contingent equivalent to Europe’s second largest armed forces and had on its territory the third world largest nuclear arsenal.[1] The process of conversion of this rather chaotic massive post-Soviet force and building the coherent national military of Ukraine went through two major stages – peace-time decline (1991-2013) and war-time transformation since the start of Russian invasion to Crimea in 2014.

Ukraine’s Security Sector Reform: Is Ukraine Taking Western Advice?
IIntroduction
Since Ukraine joined NATO’s Partnership for Peace program in 1994, and especially following the 2014 Euromaidan, the West has been supporting Ukraine in its security sector reform. The long time of the reform design and implementation may cause difficulties in assessing the reform’s progress. It has merit, therefore, to assess the Security Sector Reform in Ukraine in the aspects of its two key variables: governance and effectiveness.
