Skip to main content
Search for articles, authors, keywords
Abstract:

This article examines the process of formulating defense policy by analyzing the key considerations and evaluation criteria that underpin effective decision-making. Drawing on historical developments from the post-Cold War era to current geopolitical challenges, the study emphasizes the importance of balancing strategic ends with available means within a resource-constrained and uncertain planning environment. It outlines the key elements in defense policymaking—defining objectives, strategy, and capabilities—and highlights how risk assessment plays a central role in aligning force structure with national security goals and resource allocation. Through qualitative analysis and illustrative figures, the study offers practical recommendations for policymakers, emphasizing the need for a systematic, adaptable, and transparent policymaking process. Ultimately, the article argues that a rational and disciplined approach to defining both ends and means, combined with creative exploration, is essential for preparing for the uncertainty of today’s security environment. A follow-up study will focus on the processes, stakeholders, and cultural factors in shaping defense policy.

Creative Commons BY-SA

Article statistics

1 Views
0 Downloads

Bibliography

“AWACS: NATO’s ‘eyes in the sky’,” What We Do, November 14, 2023, https://www.nato.int/cps/ua/natohq/topics_48904.htm.  

“Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014-2024),” News, NATO, June 17, 2024, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_226465.htm.  

“NATO Defence Planning Process,” What We Do, last updated March 31, 2022, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49202.htm.  

“NATO Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Force (NISRF),” What We Dohttps://www.nato.int/cps/ua/natohq/topics_48892.htm.  

“Policy,” Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, accessed October 14, 2024, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/policy.  

“Strategic Airlift,” NATO, last updated March 7, 2024, https://www.nato.int/cps/ru/natohq/topics_50107.htm?selectedLocale=en.   

2024 Defence White Paper: Strong, Smart, and Together (The Hague: Ministry of Defence, 2024), https://english.defensie.nl/downloads/publications/2024/09/05/defence-white-paper-2024.  

Analysis Support Guide for Risk-Based Strategic Planning, STO-TR-SAS-093-Part-I (NATO Science & Technology Organization, 2018).

Bakken, Bent Erik, Handbook on Long-Term Defence Planning, RTO Technical Report 69 (Paris: NATO Research and Technology Organization, April 2003), https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Technical%20Reports/RTO-TR-069/TR-069-$$ALL.pdf.  

Bartlett, Henry, G. Paul Holman, and Timothy E. Somes, “The Art of Strategy and Force Planning,” in Strategy and Force Planning, ed. Richmond M. Lloyd et al., 4th ed. (Newport, RI: Naval War College Press, 2004), 17-33. 

Conceptual Framework for Comprehensive National Defence System, STO-TR-SAS-152 (STO, 2024). 

Derleth, Jim, and Jeff Pickler, “Twenty-first Century Threats Require Twenty-first Century Deterrence,” Connections: The Quarterly Journal 21, no. 2 (2022): 11-23, https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.21.2.01.  

Dimitrov, Nedko, and Kalin Karakolev, “Seabed Critical Infrastructures,” Information & Security: An International Journal 55, no. 2 (2024): 133-148, https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.5566.  

Dobias, Peter, and Kyle Christensen, “The ‘Grey Zone’ and Hybrid Activities,” Connections: The Quarterly Journal 21, no. 2 (2022): 41-54, https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.21.2.03

DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, March 2017), https://www.tradoc.army.mil/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/AD1029823-DOD-Dictionary-of-Military-and-Associated-Terms-2017.pdf.  

Global Britain in a Competitive Age: The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy, Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty, March 2021.

Hagemann, Frank, “The Myth of Bipolarity: How to Understand Strategic Competition in a Globalized World,” Connections: The Quarterly Journal 23, no. 2 (2024): 7-20, https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.23.2.00.  

Handbook on Long Term Defence Planning, RTO Technical Report 69 (Paris: NATO Research and Technology Organization, 2003).

International Organization for Standardization, “Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines,” ISO 31000:2009.

Lombardi, Ben, “An Overview of Civil‐Military Relations in Central and Eastern Europe,” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 12, no. 1 (1999): 13-33, https://doi.org/10.1080/13518049908430375.  

Mitrakiev, Boyan, and Noncho Dimitrov, “The Need for Emotional Cues Analysis in OSINT in Countering Reflexive Control Information Warfare Campaigns: A Critical Review and Reconceptualization,” Information & Security: An International Journal 55, no. 3 (2024): 275-298, https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.5514.  

National Security Strategy (Washington, D.C.: The White House, October 2022).

National Strategic Review 2022 (Paris: Secrétariat général de la defense et de la sécurité nationale, 2022), https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/rns-uk-20221202.pdf.  

NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions, AAP-6 Edition 2019, NATO Standardization Office, https://www.coemed.org/files/stanags/05_AAP/AAP-06_2019_EF.pdf

Nelson, Daniel, “Beyond Defense Planning,” in Transparency in Defense Policy, Military Budgeting and Procurement, ed. Todor Tagarev (Sofia: Geneva Centre for DCAF and “George C. Marshall–Bulgaria,” 2002), 17-26.

Oskarrson, Katerina, and Robin Barnett, “The Effectiveness of DIMEFIL Instruments of Power in the Gray Zone,” Open Publications (Allied Command Transformation) 1, no. 2 (2017). 

Our Future Defence: The Focus of Swedish Defence Policy 2005–2007, Swedish Government Bill 2004/05:5, https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/155135/Sweden_eng.pdf

Our North, Strong and Free: A Renewed Vision for Canada’s Defence, Government of Canada, May 3, 2024, https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/reports-publications/north-strong-free-2024.html.  

Performance Management in Defence Organisations, Technical Report TR-SAS-096-Part-I (Paris: NATO Science & Technology Organization, 2020).

Polish Defence in the Perspective of 2032 (Warsaw: Ministry of National Defence, 2017), https://www.gov.pl/web/national-defence/polish-defence-in-the-perspective-of-2032.  

Quadrennial Defense Review 2014 (Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, March 2014), https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/quadrennial/QDR2014.pdf.  

Risk-Based Framework for Strategic Planning: Case Studies, STO-TR-SAS-093-Part-II (STO, 2018).

Simon, Jeffrey, “The New NATO Members: Will They Contribute?” Strategic Forum 160 (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University, April 1999), https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA394521

Tagarev, Todor, “The Art of Shaping Defense Policy: Scope, Components, Relationships (but no Algorithms),” Connections: The Quarterly Journal 5, no. 1 (Spring-Summer 2006): 15-34, https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.05.1.03.  

The National Defense Strategy of the United States of America (Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, March 2005).

Themes