Skip to main content
Search for articles, authors, keywords
Abstract: The consequences of staying outside the European Economic and Monetary Union can be divided into three categories: political, economic, and social. For the United Kingdom, most attention has been concentrated on the issue of economic gains and losses. The potential gains include a possibility for the British government to conduct its own national economic and monetary policy, the elimination of socalled social dumping, preserving the British mortgage and housing markets, and promoting London as a worldwide financial center. Moreover, approving the Euro could enlarge British foreign trade and enhance inflows of foreign direct investment. On the other hand, the negative economic consequences focus on lack of transparency of prices, no elimination of transaction costs, and the risk of disrupting the exchange rate of the pound sterling. The political and social consequences of staying outside the Euro zone must also be taken into account when analyzing the British case. Without participating in the common currency, the United Kingdom could preserve her national sovereignty and independence, although this remains questionable in the current world, which is characterized by high levels of interdependence. Likewise, the British stand to lose their influence in the European Union and in the world by not participating in the third stage of the EMU.
Creative Commons BY-SA

Article statistics

Konarzewska, Anna. (2008) 2008. “Outside the European Economic and Monetary Union: Consequences for the United Kingdom”. Connections: The Quarterly Journal 7 (1): 120-40. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/Connections.07.1.07.
14900 Views
6028 Downloads

Bibliography

Tavlas, George S.. "Benefits and Costs of Entering the Eurozone." Cato Journal 24 (2004): 89-106.

Ahearne, Alan, and Jean Pisani-Ferry. "The Euro: Only for the Agile." In Bruegel Policy Brief., 2006.

Gradziuk, Artur, and Katarzyna Sochacka. "Zagadnienie integracji walutowej w Unii Europejskiej na przykładzie Danii, Szwecji i Wielkiej Brytanii." Biuletyn PISM 70 (2002).

Fratianni, Michele, and Jurgen von HagenThe European Monetary System and European Monetary Union . Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992.

Padoa-Schioppa, TomassoThe Road to Monetary Union in Europe: The Emperor, the Kings, and the Genies . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Record, Neil. "Europe is Dragging Britain into the Mire." Financial Times (2005).

Currie, David. "EMU: Threats and Opportunities for Companies and National Economies." In The Impact of the Euro. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.

Layard, RichardDavid CurrieChristopher HuhneWill HuttonPeter KenenRobert MundellAdair Turner, and Willem BuiterThe Case for the Euro. London: Britain in Europe Campaign, Ltd., 2000.

Currie, David. "The Pros and Cons." In HM Treasury ., 1997.

Bishop, G., and D. Hiller. "News Analysis: Has Britain Passed the Treasury’s Tests for Joining the Euro?The Independent (2002).

Gottfries, Nils. "Why is Sweden not in EMU?Current Sweden 435 (2002).

Talani, Laila. "Who Wins and Who Loses in the City of London from the Establishment of Euro-pean Monetary Union." In After the Euro. Shaping Institutions for Governance in the Wake of European Monetary Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Dyson, Kenneth, and Kevin FeatherstoneThe Road to Maastricht: Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Kendle, JohnFederal Britain: A History . London: Routledge, 1997.

George, StephenPolitics and Policy in the European Union . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Oręziak, LeokadiaEuro – nowy pieniądz . Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1999.

Dyson, KennethEuropean States and the Euro: Europeanization, Variation, and Convergence . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Barysch, Katinka. "Britain and the Euro: How to Reap the Benefits." In Policy Brief . London: Centre for European Reform, 2003.

Themes