Connections the quarterly journal

Search form

  • Like Connections page on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Find connections on Istagram
  • Connect with us on LinkedIN
  • Subscribe to Connections RSS
  • English
  • Русский
  • Journal
    • Previews
    • Archive
    • Top papers
    • Athena Award
  • Submissions
    • Guidelines
    • Copyright information
    • Conflict of interest
    • Ethics in publishing
    • Themes
    • Calls for articles
    • Submit a paper
  • About
    • Mission
    • Editorial policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Editorial Board
    • Advisers
    • Author Index
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy policy
Share/Save

U.S. and Russia Differ on a Treaty for Cyberspace

Publication Type:

Newspaper Article

Authors:

John Markoff; Andrew E. Kramer

Source:

New York Times (2009)
  • 12105 reads
  • Google Scholar
  • RTF
  • EndNote XML

Active calls for articles

Russia at War: Strategic Competition, Confrontation, and Conflict

Deadline:
15.12.2024

Democratic Backsliding and Security Governance

Deadline:
14.12.2024

Check also our Google Scholar profile

  • Downloads
  • Cited in
  • How to cite
No files have yet been downloaded.
Van Epps, Geoff. "Common Ground: U.S. and NATO Engagement with Russia in the Cyber Domain." Connections: The Quarterly Journal 12, no. 4 (2013): 15-50.
"Общая основа: отношения США и НАТО с Россией в киберпространстве." Connections: The Quarterly Journal 12, no. 4 (2013): 17-59.
APA style: Markoff, J., & Kramer A. E. (2009).  U.S. and Russia Differ on a Treaty for Cyberspace. New York Times.
Chicago style: Markoff, John, and Andrew E. Kramer. "U.S. and Russia Differ on a Treaty for Cyberspace." New York Times (2009).
IEEE style: Markoff, J., and A. E. Kramer, "U.S. and Russia Differ on a Treaty for Cyberspace", New York Times, 28 June 2009.
  • Trending
  • Latest
  • Most cited
  • Growing Apart: The Impact of the Russian War in Ukraine on the Former Soviet Space (2,823)
  • The Critical Black Sea Zone (1,873)
  • Declaration of the Russian State as a State Sponsor of Terrorism: Pros, Cons, and Realities (1,350)
  • Military-Economic Capabilities of Ukraine During the Transformation (1,349)
  • Polyakh and Others v. Ukraine: The Latest Standards of Applicability of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights in Lustration Cases (1,283)
view all
  • The European Union and Strategic Competition
  • India's Stake and Role in the U.S.-China Strategic Competition
  • Strategic Competition and the Battle of Narratives: A Sociopsychological Perspective
  • Navigating the Trilemma of (In)security: Strategic Competition in the Black Sea Region
  • Strategic Competition and U.S. National Strategies
view all
Introduction to Program-based Defense Resource Management (8)
The Art of Shaping Defense Policy: Scope, Components, Relationships (but no Algorithms) (6)
NATO and the South Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia on Different Tracks (5)
Terror-Crime Nexus? Terrorism and Arms, Drug, and Human Trafficking in Georgia (4)
Terrorist Routes in Central Asia: Trafficking Drugs, Humans, and Weapons (4)
view all

© Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes, 2012-2024
This site was designed and is maintained by Procon Ltd., Executive publisher of Connections: The Quarterly Journal