Connections the quarterly journal

Search form

  • Like Connections page on Facebook(link is external)
  • Follow us on Twitter(link is external)
  • Find connections on Instagram(link is external)
  • Connect with us on LinkedIN(link is external)
  • Subscribe to Connections RSS
  • English
  • Русский
  • Journal
    • Previews
    • Archive
    • Top papers
    • Athena Award
  • Submissions
    • Guidelines
    • Copyright information
    • Conflict of interest
    • Ethics in publishing
    • Themes
    • Calls for articles
    • Submit a paper
  • About
    • Mission
    • Editorial policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Editorial Board
    • Advisers
    • Author Index
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy policy
Share/Save

The Debate on NATO Expansion

07.4.01_Frydrych.pdf

Publication Type:

Journal Article

Authors:

Eunika Katarzyna Frydrych

Source:

Connections: The Quarterly Journal, Volume 7, Issue 4, p.1-42 (2008)
  • 22061 reads
  • Google Scholar(link is external)
  • DOI(link is external)
  • RTF
  • EndNote XML

References

Heindel, Richard H., Thorsten V. Kalijarvi, and Francis O. Wilcox. "The North Atlantic Treaty in the United States Senate(link is external)." The American Journal of International Law 43 (1949).
Walt, Stephen M.. The Origins of Alliances . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.
Smith, Mark. NATO Enlargement during the Cold War: Strategy and System in the Western Alliance (link is external). Houndmills, U.K.: Palgrave, 2003.
Piccoli, Wolfango. "Alliance Theory: The Case of Turkey and Israel(link is external)." In CIAO Working Papers ., 1999.
Andreatta, Philippo. "Theory and the European Union’s International Relations(link is external)." In International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Hodge, Carl C.. NATO for a New Century: Atlanticism and European Security (link is external). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2002.
Glaser, Charles L.. "Why NATO Is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe(link is external)." International Security 18, no. 1 (1993).
Goldgeier, James M.. Not Whether But When: The U.S. Decision to Enlarge NATO(link is external). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press, 1999.

Active calls for articles

Empowering the Trans-Atlantic Defense Industrial Base

Deadline:
30.06.2025

Hybrid Operations

Deadline:
15.09.2025

Check also our Google Scholar profile(link is external)

  • Downloads
  • Cited in
  • How to cite
  • File Name: 07.4.01_Frydrych.pdf
    Size: 291.68 KB
    Number of Downloads: 12509
Schuchardt, Dirk. Germany’s Interests in Future NATO Enlargement(link is external) In SWP-Studie., 2009.
Wolff, Andrew T.. Explaining NATO expansion into Central and Eastern Europe, 1989–2004: An analysis of geopolitical factors, rationales, and rhetoric. The Johns Hopkins University, 2010.
Carati, Andrea, and Marco Clementi. "La Nato e la distribuzione dei costi della forza, Rivista italiana di scienza politica." Italian Political Science Review 1 (2010).
Gaidžiūnaitė, Lina. Energetinis Saugumas Ir Nato Vaidmuo Baltijos Šalyse In Politikos mokslų ir diplomatijos fakultetas, Regionistikos katedra. Vol. Magistro baigiamasis darbas. Kaunas: Vytauto didžiojo universitetas, 2009.
Carati, Andrea. "R2P, NATO and the Problem of Who Should Intervene?" In TSA 15th Annual Conference 2016 – University of Plymouth., 2016.
APA style: Frydrych, E. Katarzyna (2008).  The Debate on NATO Expansion. Connections: The Quarterly Journal. 7(4), 1-42.
Chicago style: Frydrych, Eunika Katarzyna. "The Debate on NATO Expansion." Connections: The Quarterly Journal 7, no. 4 (2008): 1-42.
IEEE style: Frydrych, E. Katarzyna, "The Debate on NATO Expansion", Connections: The Quarterly Journal, vol. 7, issue 4, pp. 1-42, Fall 2008.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/Connections.07.4.01(link is external)
  • Trending
  • Latest(active tab)
  • Most cited
  • The Weaponization of Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Global Risk: A Perspective from the PfPC Emerging Security Challenges Working Group (2,003)
  • Towards a New Role for the European Union in the South Caucasus? (1,482)
  • Goodbye Globalization? Hello 'Fragmentegration'! - The World Economy and Strategic Competition (1,359)
  • The PfP Consortium Regional Stability in South East Europe Working Group at 25: The Transformed Balkans and the Work Ahead (1,348)
  • Hybrid Threats and Strategic Competition (1,313)
view all
  • Communicating (In)Security in Ukraine
  • Hybrid Warfare in the Black Sea Region: Russian Information-Psychological Operations in Georgia
  • Ukraine's Component in the Platform of European Memory and Conscience
  • Kremlin's 'War on Terrorism' in the Northeastern Caucasus: How Chechnya Still 'Saves' Russia
  • A Theory of Change: 25 Years of the Partnership for Peace Consortium
view all
Introduction to Program-based Defense Resource Management (8)
The Art of Shaping Defense Policy: Scope, Components, Relationships (but no Algorithms) (6)
NATO and the South Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia on Different Tracks (5)
Terror-Crime Nexus? Terrorism and Arms, Drug, and Human Trafficking in Georgia (4)
Terrorist Routes in Central Asia: Trafficking Drugs, Humans, and Weapons (4)
view all

© Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes(link is external), 2012-2025
This site was designed and is maintained by Procon Ltd.(link is external), Executive publisher of Connections: The Quarterly Journal