Connections the quarterly journal

Search form

  • Like Connections page on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Find connections on Istagram
  • Connect with us on LinkedIN
  • Subscribe to Connections RSS
  • English
  • Русский
  • Journal
    • Previews
    • Archive
    • Top papers
    • Athena Award
  • Submissions
    • Guidelines
    • Copyright information
    • Conflict of interest
    • Ethics in publishing
    • Themes
    • Calls for articles
    • Submit a paper
  • About
    • Mission
    • Editorial policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Editorial Board
    • Advisers
    • Author Index
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy policy
Share/Save

Cybersecurity: Could Investment Company Directors be Liable for a Breach?

Publication Type:

Journal Article

Authors:

Delibert, A. C.; Laurent, M.W.; Schneider L.L.

Source:

The Investment Lawyer, Volume 22, Issue 2 (2015)
  • 8018 reads
  • Google Scholar
  • RTF
  • EndNote XML

Active calls for articles

Russia at War: Strategic Competition, Confrontation, and Conflict

Deadline:
01.03.2025

Check also our Google Scholar profile

  • Downloads
  • Cited in
  • How to cite
No files have yet been downloaded.
Collier, Raymond. "The Obama Administration and Incident Response: A Report." Information & Security: An International Journal 34, no. 2 (2016): 105-120.
APA style: Delibert, A. C., Laurent M.W., & L.L. S. (2015).  Cybersecurity: Could Investment Company Directors be Liable for a Breach? . The Investment Lawyer. 22(2), 
Chicago style: Delibert, A. C., M.W. Laurent, and Schneider L.L.. "Cybersecurity: Could Investment Company Directors be Liable for a Breach? ." The Investment Lawyer 22, no. 2 (2015).
IEEE style: Delibert, A. C., M.W. Laurent, and S. L.L., "Cybersecurity: Could Investment Company Directors be Liable for a Breach? ", The Investment Lawyer, vol. 22, issue 2, 2015.
  • Trending
  • Latest
  • Most cited
  • Growing Apart: The Impact of the Russian War in Ukraine on the Former Soviet Space (3,005)
  • The Critical Black Sea Zone (2,074)
  • Military-Economic Capabilities of Ukraine During the Transformation (1,566)
  • Declaration of the Russian State as a State Sponsor of Terrorism: Pros, Cons, and Realities (1,532)
  • Hybrid Threats and Strategic Competition (737)
view all
  • A Theory of Change: 25 Years of the Partnership for Peace Consortium
  • The Evolution of DEEP Faculty Development under the Partnership for Peace Consortium
  • Reference Curricula: An Impactful Tool for Institutional Capacity Building?
  • The Weaponization of Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Global Risk: A Perspective from the PfPC Emerging Security Challenges Working Group
  • From Civil-Military Relations to Resilience: The Fifth Wave of Strengthening Democracy through Research and Education
view all
Introduction to Program-based Defense Resource Management (8)
The Art of Shaping Defense Policy: Scope, Components, Relationships (but no Algorithms) (6)
NATO and the South Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia on Different Tracks (5)
Terror-Crime Nexus? Terrorism and Arms, Drug, and Human Trafficking in Georgia (4)
Terrorist Routes in Central Asia: Trafficking Drugs, Humans, and Weapons (4)
view all

© Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes, 2012-2025
This site was designed and is maintained by Procon Ltd., Executive publisher of Connections: The Quarterly Journal