Connections the quarterly journal

Search form

  • Like Connections page on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Find connections on Instagram
  • Connect with us on LinkedIN
  • Subscribe to Connections RSS
  • English
  • Русский
  • Journal
    • Previews
    • Archive
    • Top papers
    • Athena Award
  • Submissions
    • Guidelines
    • Copyright information
    • Conflict of interest
    • Ethics in publishing
    • Themes
    • Calls for articles
    • Submit a paper
  • About
    • Mission
    • Editorial policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Editorial Board
    • Advisers
    • Author Index
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy policy
Share/Save

Bound to Follow? Leadership and Followership in the Gulf Conflict

Publication Type:

Journal Article

Authors:

Andrew Fenton Cooper; Richard A. Higgot; Kim Richard Nossal

Source:

Political Science Quarterly, Volume 106, Issue 3, p.391–410; 398ff (1991)
  • 13893 reads
  • Google Scholar
  • RTF
  • EndNote XML

Active calls for articles

Empowering the Trans-Atlantic Defense Industrial Base

Deadline:
30.06.2025

Hybrid Operations

Deadline:
15.09.2025

Check also our Google Scholar profile

  • Downloads
  • Cited in
  • How to cite
No files have yet been downloaded.
Sloan, Stanley R., and Heiko Borchert. "Mind the Three Transatlantic Power Gaps: How a New Framework Can Help Reinvent the Transatlantic Relationship." Connections: The Quarterly Journal 2, no. 3 (2003): 35-49.
APA style: Cooper, A. Fenton, Higgot R. A., & Nossal K. Richard (1991).  Bound to Follow? Leadership and Followership in the Gulf Conflict. Political Science Quarterly. 106(3), 391–410; 398ff.
Chicago style: Cooper, Andrew Fenton, Richard A. Higgot, and Kim Richard Nossal. "Bound to Follow? Leadership and Followership in the Gulf Conflict." Political Science Quarterly 106, no. 3 (1991): 391-410; 398ff.
IEEE style: Cooper, A. Fenton, R. A. Higgot, and K. Richard Nossal, "Bound to Follow? Leadership and Followership in the Gulf Conflict", Political Science Quarterly, vol. 106, issue 3, pp. 391–410; 398ff, 1991.
  • Trending
  • Latest
  • Most cited
  • The Weaponization of Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Global Risk: A Perspective from the PfPC Emerging Security Challenges Working Group (2,057)
  • Towards a New Role for the European Union in the South Caucasus? (1,551)
  • The PfP Consortium Regional Stability in South East Europe Working Group at 25: The Transformed Balkans and the Work Ahead (1,394)
  • Goodbye Globalization? Hello 'Fragmentegration'! - The World Economy and Strategic Competition (1,386)
  • Hybrid Threats and Strategic Competition (1,380)
view all
  • Communicating (In)Security in Ukraine
  • Hybrid Warfare in the Black Sea Region: Russian Information-Psychological Operations in Georgia
  • Ukraine's Component in the Platform of European Memory and Conscience
  • Kremlin's 'War on Terrorism' in the Northeastern Caucasus: How Chechnya Still 'Saves' Russia
  • A Theory of Change: 25 Years of the Partnership for Peace Consortium
view all
Introduction to Program-based Defense Resource Management (8)
The Art of Shaping Defense Policy: Scope, Components, Relationships (but no Algorithms) (6)
NATO and the South Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia on Different Tracks (5)
Terror-Crime Nexus? Terrorism and Arms, Drug, and Human Trafficking in Georgia (4)
Terrorist Routes in Central Asia: Trafficking Drugs, Humans, and Weapons (4)
view all

© Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes, 2012-2025
This site was designed and is maintained by Procon Ltd., Executive publisher of Connections: The Quarterly Journal