Поиск по статьям, авторам, ключевым словам
Abstract:

В статье рассмотрен вопрос о том, можно ли считать гражданских лиц, занимающихся распространением пропаганды, непосредственными участниками военных действий. Основное внимание уделяется пробелам, возникающим в связи с отсутствием положений международного права, регулирующих использование пропаганды во время вооружённых конфликтов. Утверждается, что классификация пропаганды имеет важное значение, учитывая растущее использование вредоносной цифровой информации. Пример украинских кампаний стратегической коммуникации иллюстрирует скользкую дорожку, создаваемую легкодоступными платформами социальных сетей, и опасность, исходящую от гражданских лиц, ведущих эти так называемые «кампании стратегической коммуникации». В исследовании рассмотрено применение принципа различия и понятия непосредственного участия к украинским гражданским лицам. В статье показано, что при анализе применимой правовой базы, касающейся распространения пропаганды, существует множество серых зон. Исследование заканчивается выводом, что гражданские лица, распространяющие пропаганду, не подпадают под определение непосредственных участников военных действий, поскольку не выполняется тройной тест Международного комитета Красного креста.

Ключевые слова: пропаганда дезинформация гражданские лица прямое участие различие вооружённый конфликт Украина русско-украинская война социальные сети
Метки:
Конфликт, Коммуникация, Международное право, Восточная Европа
Creative Commons BY-SA

Article statistics

Леттнер, Изабель. (2024 г.) 2024. «Пропаганда в вооружённом конфликте: Анализ правовой неопределённости и роль общества». Connections: The Quarterly Journal 23 (1): 23-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.rus.23.1.08 .
123 Views
10 Downloads

Bibliography

“Cyber Warfare,” Online Casebook (ICRC), accessed February 25, 2024, https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/cyber-warfare.

“Powers of Persuasion,” National Archives Online Exhibits, accessed February 25, 2024, https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/powers-of-persuasion.  

“We Want You!” Nabb Research Center Online Exhibit, accessed February 25, 2024, https://libapps.salisbury.edu/nabb-online/exhibits/show/propaganda/flag-waving/we-want-you-.  

Brooks, Eleanor, “Why Is Freedom of Speech Important in a Democracy: 5 Reasons,” Liberties, April 1, 2022, https://www.liberties.eu/en/stories/why-is-freedom-of-speech-important/44136.  

Brown, Thomas, “Freedom of Speech: Challenges and the Role of Public, Private, and Civil Society Sectors in Upholding Rights,” House of Lords Library (UK Parliament), December 3, 2021, https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/freedom-of-speech-challenges-and-the-role-of-public-private-and-civil-society-sectors-in-upholding-rights/.  

De Brabandere, Eric, “Propaganda,” in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law VIII, ed. Rüdiger Wolfrum (November 2012), 507-519.

Demeuse, Rodrigue, “The Russian War on Truth: Defending Allied and Partner Democracies against the Kremlin’s Disinformation Campaigns,” General Report (NATO Parliamentary Assembly, Committee on Democracy and Security, October 2023), https://www.nato-pa.int/document/2023-russian-war-truth-report-garriaud-maylam-014-cds.  

Digital Forensic Research Lab, “Undermining Ukraine: How Russia widened its global information war in 2023,” Atlantic Council, February 29, 2024, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/undermining-ukraine-how-russia-widened-its-global-information-war-in-2023/.  

Dodge, Raymond, “The Psychology of Propaganda,” Religious Education 15, no. 5 (1920): 241-252, https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408200150502.

EuropeLibera, “Gazprom Accuses Ukraine of Stealing Gas Destined for Moldova and Threatens to Cut Supplies,” Europa Libera (Radio Free Europe), November 22, 2022, https://moldova.europalibera.org/a/gazprom-acuză-ucraina-că-fură-gazele-destinate-moldovei-și-amenință-că-va-reduce-livrările-/32142927.html. – in Romanian

Fridrichová, Kateřina, “Mugged by Reality: Russia’s Strategic Narratives and the War in Ukraine,” Defense & Security Analysis 39, no. 3 (2023.): 281-95, https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2023.2201018.  

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005), 3, Rule 1, https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/other/customary-international-humanitarian-law-i-icrc-eng.pdf.  

Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group, “How Dehumanization Works in Russian Propaganda,” Ukraine Crisis Media Center, August 1, 2022, https://uacrisis.org/en/degumanizatsiya.  

INSCOP, “Chapter 4: Disinformation, Propaganda, Fake News, Trust in Information Sources,” INSCOP Research, March 31, 2021, https://www.inscop.ro/31-martie-2021-capitolul-4-dezinformare-propaganda-stiri-false-increderea-in-surse-de-informatii/. – in Romanian

International Center for Not-For-Profit Law, “Legal Responses to Disinformation,” ICNL, accessed February 25, 2024, https://www.icnl.org/wp-content/uploads/2021.03-Disinformation-Policy-Prospectus-final.pdf.

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 1) [AP I], adopted June 8, 1977, 1125 UNTS 3, entered into force December 7, 1978, https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0321.pdf.

International Court of Justice, “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996, 226, 257, https://www.icj-cij.org/case/95.

Kayali, Laura, “RT France Challenges EU Ban before Court,” Politico, March 8, 2022, https://www.politico.eu/article/rt-france-challenges-eu-ban-before-court/.  

Khan, Irene, “Disinformation and Freedom of Opinion and Expression during Armed Conflicts,” Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, UN Doc. A/77/288 (UN General Assembly, August 12, 2022), Para 105, https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n22/459/30/pdf/n2245930.pdf.

Laskin, Alexander V., “Defining Propaganda: A Psychoanalytic Perspective,” Communication and the Public 4, no. 4 (December 2019): 305-314, https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319896488.  

Margolin, Leo J., Paper Bullets: Psychological Warfare in World War II (Barajima, Japan: Barajima Books, 2020). 

Meaker, Morgan, “How Ukraine Is Winning the Propaganda War,” Wired, last modified June 13, 2022, https://www.wired.com/story/ukraine-propaganda-war/.

Melzer, Nils, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law (Geneva, Switzerland: International Committee of the Red Cross, May 2009), https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/other/icrc-002-0990.pdf.  

Pe’er, Ayelet, and Michelle Slone, “Media Exposure to Armed Conflict: Dispositional Optimism and Self-Mastery Moderate Distress and Post-Traumatic Symptoms among Adolescents,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 18, 11216 (September 2022), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811216.  

Public International Law and Policy Group, “Lex Specialis Derogat Generali: Simultaneous (Complementary) Applicability of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights,” PILPG, June 9, 2023, https://www.publicinternationallawandpolicygroup.org/lawyering-justice-blog/2023/6/9/lex-specialis-derogat-generali-simultaneous-complementary-applicability-of-international-humanitarian-law-and-human-rights.  

Schmitt, Michael N., ed., Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Cambridge University Press, 2017).

U.S. Department of Defense, “Psychological Operations,” Joint Publication 3-13.2, January 7, 2010, https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/jp3-13-2.pdf.

UN General Assembly, “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” adopted on December 16, 1966, by General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI), New York City, Art. 19(2), https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights.

UN General Assembly, “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” 217 (III) A, Paris, 1948, Art. 19, http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

United Nations, International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 (ICTY), “Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic: Judgment,” Case No. IT-98-33-T, Trial Chamber, August 2, 2001, Para 245, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/tjug/en/krs-tj010802e.pdf.

Tемы