Skip to main content
Search for articles, authors, keywords
Abstract: Current global conflict trends are pulling NATO away from its traditional collective defense mission into stability and reconstruction (S&R) operations with greater frequency. S&R environments require NATO to collaborate with and support host nation governments, international organizations, and a range of non-governmental organizations to address security, political, and social challenges. However, NATO encounters difficulty with collecting and sharing intelligence and information in these environments. This inability to communicate compounds the already complex issues faced by all entities involved. This paper identifies three policy options to help NATO improve its support to S&R operations by enhancing information-sharing mechanisms within NATO and with non-NATO stakeholders. These options are: 1) the completion of the Federated Mission Network that seeks to aggregate classified and unclassified information in a regulated virtual space; 2) the indoctrination of a Joint Information Fusion Cell to act as a physical clearinghouse for information; and 3) the development of Regional Coordination Centers and Stabilization and Reconstruction Teams to implement individual S&R projects. The progression of policy options represents increases in stakeholder engagement, operational effectiveness, and overall cost. Based on an analysis of the pros and cons associated with each option, we recommend the development of the Joint Information Fusion Cell (JIFC). This option offers a centralized facility capable of collecting, processing, and disseminating information and intelligence, and a separate, neutral facility for coordinating with non-military entities. This option confers the widest array of benefits to NATO’s contributions to S&R operations in both in-area and out-of-area environments.
Creative Commons BY-SA

Article statistics

Hanna, Michael, David Granzow, Bjorn Bolte, and Andrew Alvarado. (2017) 2017. “NATO Intelligence and Information Sharing: Improving NATO Strategy for Stabilization and Reconstruction Operations”. Connections: The Quarterly Journal 16 (4): 5-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.16.4.01.
19628 Views
8143 Downloads

Bibliography

NATOOperations and Missions: Past and Present., 2018.

Guiding Principles for Stabilization & Reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace, United States Army Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute, 2009.

Information Sharing with non-NATO Entities. NATO Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre, 2012.

Webb, Stewart. "Improvements Required for Operational and Tactical Intelligence Sharing in NATO." Defence Against Terrorism Review 6, no. 1 (2014): 47-62.

Daalder, IvoNATO’s Finest Hour. The Wall Street Journal Europe, 2011.

North Atlantic Treaty. Washington, D.C., 1949.

Fixing Intel: A Blueprint for Making Intelligence Relevant in Afghanistan. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security, 2010.

McGill, Anna-Katherine Staser, and David H. Gray. "Challenges to International Counterterrorism Intelligence Sharing." Global Security Studies 3, no. 3 (2012): 76-86.

ISAF Regional Command Structure., 2009.

U.S. Experience with Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Afghanistan: Lessons Identified In Special Report. U.S. Institute of Peace, 2005.

Fischer, Kristian, and Jan Top Christensen. "Improving Civil-Military Cooperation the Danish Way." NATO Review (2005).

McNerney, Michael J.. "Stabilization and Reconstruction in Afghanistan: Are PRTs a Model or a Muddle?Parameters 35, no. 4 (2006): 32-46.

NATO Strategic Concept 2010., 2010.

Fägersten, BjörnFor EU Eyes Only? Intelligence and European Security. European Union, Institute for Security Studies, 2016.

Ara, Martin J.Thomas Brand, and Brage A. LarssenHelp a Brother Out: A Case Study in Multinational Intelligence Sharing, NATO SOF. Vol. Master’s Thesis. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 2011.

Principal Officials. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2015.

International Military Staff. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2015.

Foster, Brian R.Enhancing the Efficiency of NATO Intelligence Under an ASG-I In Strategy Research Project. United States Army War College, 2013.

Rapid Deployable Corps. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2015.

Previous Operations. Allied Joint Force Command, 2016.

Themes